View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0027896 | Open CASCADE | OCCT:Modeling Algorithms | public | 2016-09-22 16:42 | 2016-12-09 16:39 |
Reporter | Assigned To | apn | |||
Priority | high | Severity | minor | ||
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
Product Version | Unscheduled | ||||
Target Version | 7.1.0 | Fixed in Version | 7.1.0 | ||
Summary | 0027896: Prm-Prm intersection algo returns wrong result if it is called with start intersection point, which lies in the domain boundary | ||||
Description | Test bugs modalg_5 bug25319_1(2). Draw[]> explode b1 f Draw[]> explode b2 f Draw[]> don b1_8 b2_17 Without any start point Draw[]> bopcurves b1_8 b2_17 -2d # Tolerance Reached=2.4122298283916123e-006 ==> OK With start point: Draw[]> bopcurves b1_8 b2_17 -2d -p +1.09444207768950010000 +29.00000000000000000000 +0.17740001678466785000 +2.79671571032639710000 -p +0.00000000000000000000 +26.87779254288926400000 +0.17767342824312710000 +2.80622040022304510000 # Tolerance Reached=2.2611960020325053e-007 ==> OK However, small shifting the start point (by the distance < 1.0e-13): Draw[]> bopcurves b1_8 b2_17 -2d -p +1.09444207768949960000 +29.00000000000000000000 +0.17740001678466785000 +2.79671571032639750000 -p +0.00000000000000000000 +26.87779254288926400000 +0.17767342824312710000 +2.80622040022304510000 # Tolerance Reached=0.015634546636864411 ==> WRONG. Additional information: 1. In both cases initial points are true intersection points (it has been checked with computation of distances). 2. In both (!) cases one initial point is ON UV-bounds of the intersected face. However, behavior of intersection algorithm is slight different. 3. If we extend UV-bounds of the face by 1.0e-7 (in order to be for initial point IN the domain (not ON) then intersection result will be OK. | ||||
Steps To Reproduce | Test bugs modalg_5 bug25319_1(2). explode b1 f explode b2 f don b1_8 b2_17 bopcurves b1_8 b2_17 -2d -p +1.09444207768949960000 +29.00000000000000000000 +0.17740001678466785000 +2.79671571032639750000 -p +0.00000000000000000000 +26.87779254288926400000 +0.17767342824312710000 +2.80622040022304510000 | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Test case number | bugs modalg_6 bug27896 | ||||
|
After fixing the issue #0027441, described problem will lead to regression in bugs modalg_5 bug25319_1(2) test cases. Result shape has become invalid in terms of BRepCheck algorithm (BRepCheck_NotClosed). There is the gap (in 2D-space) even on the current MASTER. However, it is covered by big vertex tolerance. In the FIX #27441, the vertex tolerance is significantly less than on the MASTER (because the vertex parameter is computed correctly). As result, on the fix, new vertex tolerance does not cover the gap. There is not any gap(s) on OCCT 7.0.0 version. It has appeared after the fix for issue 0027895. The reason is written in bug description: big edge tolerance leads to the edge be shared with existing one, i.e. to be rejected (the gap is produced). |
|
As it has been said in the message 0027896:0058994, this bug blocks integration of the issue #27441. Therefore, I increase its importance. |
|
Branch CR27896 has been created by nbv. SHA-1: 1780360d157f2063ce6ab17440e42ed6957b0578 Detailed log of new commits: Author: nbv Date: Fri Oct 28 09:37:38 2016 +0300 0027896: Prm-Prm intersection algo returns wrong result if it is called with start intersection point, which lies in the domain boundary Purger has been disabled (in IntPatch_PrmPrmIntersection algorithm) if some points have been added in the Walking line (it is stupidly, first, to insert some points in the line and, after that, to delete points from this line). Some improvements in IntWalk_PWalking::SeekPointOnBoundary(...) method have been made (see comments in the code for detail information). Some test cases have been adjusted according to their new behavior. Author: nbv Date: Thu Oct 27 19:16:40 2016 +0300 Small correction in the test case Author: nbv Date: Thu Jun 23 17:42:55 2016 +0300 0027431: [Regression to 6.9.1] Huge tolerance obtained during intersection of cylinder and sphere The root of the problem is incorrect processing of cases when intersection line goes through the apex(es) of sphere. The fix improves this situation. The algorithm is taken from DecomposeResult(...) function (see IntPatch_ImpPrmIntersection.cxx file). Before the fix, faltering steps were done to solve this problem. As result, it worked in some particular cases. Now, its possibilities have been extended significantly. Following changes have been made in the fix: 1. Class IntPatch_ALineToWLine has been rewritten cardinally. It touches as interfaces of existing methods as adding/removing some methods/fields. Correction touches both cases: going through seam of Cone/Sphere and through pole(s) of sphere. Old interface did not allow making some actions with analytical line (ALine), e.g. splitting it on several Walking-lines (WLine). 2. Restriction-line support has been removed from Implicit-Implicit intersection result (see IntPatch_Intersection::GeomGeomPerfom(...) method). It connects with the fact that the intersection algorithm itself returns precise intersection line in analytical cases (in compare with parametric intersector). Therefore, we do not need in additional (restriction) line. 3. New class IntPatch_SpecialPoints has been added. This class contains methods to add some special points (such as apex of cone, pole of sphere, point on surface boundary etc.) in intersection line (IntPatch_PointLine). It is based on the static functions, which already exist in IntPatch_ImpPrmIntersection.cxx file (these functions have been moved to the new class). 4. Method IntPatch_WLineTool::ExtendTwoWlinesToEachOther(...) has been renamed to IntPatch_WLineTool::ExtendTwoWLines(...). It is connected with changing main idea of the method. Now it allows extending WLine to the surface boundary or to the singular point (if it is possible): cone apex, sphere pole etc. Interface of this method has been corrected, too. At that, old functionality (extending to each other) has been kept. For implementation of this algorithm, new enumeration "IntPatchWT_WLsConnectionType" has been created. 5. Method IntPatch_PointLine::CurvatureRadiusOfIntersLine(...) has been added. See IntPatch_PointLine.hxx for detail information. It allows correct step computing depended on the local curvature of the intersection line. This method uses geometrical properties of intersected surfaces to compute local curvature. Therefore, it can be applied in wide range of cases even if the intersection curve is not represented in explicit form (e.g. in case of param-param-intersection). 6. Method IntSurf::SetPeriod(...) has been created. 7. Additional check has been added in Draft_Modification::Perform() method for better choice of correct fragment of intersection line for processing DRAFT operation. 8. New overload method IntPatch_Point::SetValue() has been added. 9. Some refactoring of the code has been made. Creation of test case for issue #27431. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Some test cases have been adjusted according to their new behavior. tests\bugs\modalg_4\bug62 It is really IMPROVEMENT (but fortuitous). tests\bugs\modalg_5\bug25838 The behavior of this test has been reverted to the state before fixing the issue #27341. Main problem has not been fixed in #27341. It was fortuitous improvement. tests\bugs\moddata_2\bug565 Quality of intersection curve was not checked. And the curve is bad on both MASTER and FIX. Input data are really wrong: plane-like-cone. However, on the MASTER, four intersection curves (the quality is insignificant) are expected. On the fix, not empty intersection result is expected simply. tests\boolean\volumemaker\A8 Differences in images and CPU is expected. Difference in images is expected to be fixed in the issue #26020. Now, we should apply this behavior. Much CPU time is spent by IntTools_FaceFace::ComputeTolReached3d(...) and GeomInt_IntSS::BuildPCurves(...) methods calling. These methods are not touched by the algorithm. It is the result of change of intersection curve(s) form. However, the new Curve(s) seems to be valid and can be applied. As result, new behavior can be applied, too. tests\boolean\volumemaker\F8 tests\boolean\volumemaker\F9 tests\boolean\volumemaker\G5 tests\boolean\volumemaker\G6 CPU difference is expected. Much CPU time is spent by IntPatch_PointLine::CurvatureRadiusOfIntersLine(...) method calling. This method is really new (it does not exist on the MASTER) and is really useful. Therefore, we should apply new behavior. tests\boolean\volumemaker\G1 CPU difference is expected. Much CPU time is spent by IntTools_WLineTool::DecompositionOfWLine(...) and IntTools_FaceFace::ComputeTolReached3d(...) methods calling. These methods are not touched by the algorithm. It is the result of change of intersection curve(s) form. However, the new Curve(s) seems to be valid and can be applied. As result, new behavior can be applied, too. tests\bugs\modalg_6\bug26619 Differences in images is expected. The test keeps its BAD status on the FIX. But the result on the fix is nearer to expected than on the MASTER. Issue #27014 is still actual. As before, it is not clear, why the number of entities is different. The number of section curves has not been changed. Interfered entities are the same as on the MASTER. tests\bugs\modalg_5\bug25319_1(2) The reason is described in the issue 0027896. Author: emv Date: Wed Apr 27 16:28:52 2016 +0300 0027441: The method IntTools_Context::IsVertexOnLine incorrectly computes parameter of the point on the curve Choosing the closest bound to the checking point. |
|
Dear Mikhail, Please review the branch CR27896. Please pay attention to the fact that it is rebased on CR27431_5 branch because the real regression will be obtained after the fix #27441. So, this fix (0027896) should be tested with CR27431_prod branch (from products git-repository). More over, results and explanations given in the messages 0027431:0059658 and below are actual for this fix. |
|
Reviewed. Please test CR27896 in occt and CR27431_prod in occt-products. |
|
Branch CR27896 has been updated by nbv. SHA-1: 79fa1657ccb3257d56dbf4b03bb1dc44329e9052 Detailed log of new commits: Author: nbv Date: Tue Nov 1 17:00:11 2016 +0300 Correction according to the last remark |
|
Dear nbv, could you please rebase branch CR27896 on IR-2016-11-02, there are conflict files. SHA-1: 79fa1657ccb3257d56dbf4b03bb1dc44329e9052 |
|
Branch CR27896_1 has been created by nbv. SHA-1: c78fb35648f525cb2b4b67b1b53994313fb92181 Detailed log of new commits: Author: nbv Date: Fri Oct 28 09:37:38 2016 +0300 0027896: Prm-Prm intersection algo returns wrong result if it is called with start intersection point, which lies in the domain boundary Purger has been disabled (in IntPatch_PrmPrmIntersection algorithm) if some points have been added in the Walking line (it is stupidly, first, to insert some points in the line and, after that, to delete points from this line). Some improvements in IntWalk_PWalking::SeekPointOnBoundary(...) method have been made (see comments in the code for detail information). Some test cases have been adjusted according to their new behavior. |
|
Done. Please test CR27896_1 branch. |
|
Dear BugMaster, Branch CR27896_1 was rebased on IR-2016-11-02 of occt git-repository. SHA-1: c78fb35648f525cb2b4b67b1b53994313fb92181 |
|
Dear BugMaster, Branch CR27896_1 from occt git-repository (and master from products git-repository) was compiled on Linux, MacOS and Windows platforms and tested on Release mode. SHA-1: c78fb35648f525cb2b4b67b1b53994313fb92181 Number of compiler warnings: occt component : Linux: 0 (0 on master) Windows: 0 (0 on master) MacOS : 0 (0 on master) products component : Linux: 63 (63 on master) Windows: 0 (0 on master) MacOS : 1121 Regressions/Differences/Improvements: No regressions/differences Testing cases: http://occt-tests/CR27896_1-master-OCCT/Debian70-64/bugs/modalg_6/bug27896.html http://occt-tests/CR27896_1-master-OCCT/Windows-64-VC10/bugs/modalg_6/bug27896.html bugs modalg_6 bug27896: OK Testing on Linux: occt component : Total MEMORY difference: 90830898 / 91227129 [-0.43%] Total CPU difference: 19338.359999999844 / 19512.96000000008 [-0.89%] products component : Total MEMORY difference: 30463448 / 30478667 [-0.05%] Total CPU difference: 5185.969999999971 / 5176.759999999966 [+0.18%] Testing on Windows: occt component : Total MEMORY difference: 57448030 / 57451773 [-0.01%] Total CPU difference: 18474.855227798602 / 17672.82288659874 [+4.54%] products component : Total MEMORY difference: 21510364 / 21473188 [+0.17%] Total CPU difference: 5270.712186399966 / 5107.691141399945 [+3.19%] There are no differences in images found by testdiff. |
|
Dear BugMaster, Branch CR27896_1 is TESTED. |
|
Branch CR27896 has been deleted by kgv. SHA-1: 79fa1657ccb3257d56dbf4b03bb1dc44329e9052 |
|
Branch CR27896_1 has been deleted by kgv. SHA-1: c78fb35648f525cb2b4b67b1b53994313fb92181 |
occt: master f73c584c 2016-10-28 06:37:38
Committer: apn Details Diff |
0027896: Prm-Prm intersection algo returns wrong result if it is called with start intersection point, which lies in the domain boundary Purger has been disabled (in IntPatch_PrmPrmIntersection algorithm) if some points have been added in the Walking line (it is stupidly, first, to insert some points in the line and, after that, to delete points from this line). Some improvements in IntWalk_PWalking::SeekPointOnBoundary(...) method have been made (see comments in the code for detail information). Some test cases have been adjusted according to their new behavior. |
Affected Issues 0027896 |
|
mod - src/Draft/Draft_Modification_1.cxx | Diff File | ||
mod - src/IntPatch/IntPatch_ImpPrmIntersection.cxx | Diff File | ||
mod - src/IntPatch/IntPatch_PrmPrmIntersection.cxx | Diff File | ||
mod - src/IntPatch/IntPatch_WLine.cxx | Diff File | ||
mod - src/IntWalk/IntWalk_PWalking.cxx | Diff File | ||
mod - src/IntWalk/IntWalk_PWalking.hxx | Diff File | ||
mod - tests/bugs/modalg_5/bug24585_1 | Diff File | ||
mod - tests/bugs/modalg_5/bug25319_1 | Diff File | ||
mod - tests/bugs/modalg_5/bug25319_2 | Diff File | ||
add - tests/bugs/modalg_6/bug27896 | Diff File |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2016-09-22 16:42 |
|
New Issue | |
2016-09-22 16:42 |
|
Assigned To | => msv |
2016-09-22 16:43 |
|
Relationship added | child of 0027895 |
2016-09-22 16:50 |
|
Assigned To | msv => nbv |
2016-09-22 16:50 |
|
Priority | normal => low |
2016-09-22 16:50 |
|
Status | new => assigned |
2016-10-12 09:30 |
|
Description Updated | |
2016-10-24 10:48 |
|
Note Added: 0058994 | |
2016-11-01 14:11 |
|
Priority | low => high |
2016-11-01 14:11 |
|
Severity | trivial => minor |
2016-11-01 14:14 |
|
Note Added: 0059689 | |
2016-11-01 14:42 | git | Note Added: 0059692 | |
2016-11-01 14:55 |
|
Note Added: 0059694 | |
2016-11-01 14:55 |
|
Assigned To | nbv => msv |
2016-11-01 14:55 |
|
Status | assigned => resolved |
2016-11-01 17:14 |
|
Note Added: 0059715 | |
2016-11-01 17:15 |
|
Assigned To | msv => bugmaster |
2016-11-01 17:15 |
|
Status | resolved => reviewed |
2016-11-01 17:16 | git | Note Added: 0059716 | |
2016-11-02 15:40 |
|
Assigned To | bugmaster => mkv |
2016-11-02 17:20 |
|
Note Added: 0059798 | |
2016-11-02 17:20 |
|
Assigned To | mkv => nbv |
2016-11-02 17:20 |
|
Status | reviewed => assigned |
2016-11-02 17:20 |
|
Note Edited: 0059798 | |
2016-11-02 17:37 | git | Note Added: 0059802 | |
2016-11-02 17:38 |
|
Note Added: 0059803 | |
2016-11-02 17:38 |
|
Note Edited: 0059803 | |
2016-11-02 17:38 |
|
Assigned To | nbv => msv |
2016-11-02 17:38 |
|
Status | assigned => resolved |
2016-11-02 17:39 |
|
Assigned To | msv => mkv |
2016-11-02 17:39 |
|
Status | resolved => reviewed |
2016-11-03 16:48 |
|
Note Added: 0059863 | |
2016-11-03 16:49 |
|
Note Added: 0059864 | |
2016-11-03 16:49 |
|
Note Added: 0059865 | |
2016-11-03 16:49 |
|
Assigned To | mkv => bugmaster |
2016-11-03 16:49 |
|
Status | reviewed => tested |
2016-11-03 16:50 |
|
Test case number | => bugs modalg_6 bug27896 |
2016-11-09 17:43 | apn | Changeset attached | => occt master f73c584c |
2016-11-09 17:43 | apn | Assigned To | bugmaster => apn |
2016-11-09 17:43 | apn | Status | tested => verified |
2016-11-09 17:43 | apn | Resolution | open => fixed |
2016-12-07 11:25 | git | Note Added: 0061204 | |
2016-12-07 11:25 | git | Note Added: 0061205 | |
2016-12-09 16:30 |
|
Status | verified => closed |
2016-12-09 16:39 |
|
Fixed in Version | => 7.1.0 |