MantisBT
Mantis Bug Tracker Workflow

View Issue Details Jump to Notes ] Issue History ] Print ]
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0026590Open CASCADE[OCCT] OCCT:Modeling Algorithmspublic2015-08-24 10:042017-12-05 17:09
Reporterpkv 
Assigned Tomsv 
PrioritynormalSeverityminor 
StatusassignedResolutionopen 
PlatformOSOS Version
Product Version 
Target Version[OCCT] 7.4.0*Fixed in Version 
Summary0026590: Inconsistent results obtained by checkshape
DescriptionInconsistent results obtained by checkshape.

The results provided by checkshape differs for
inverted solid and face.

Steps To Reproduce# Case 1.
box b 10 10 10
explode b f

invert b
checkshape b
#Result: This shape seems to be valid

invert b_5
checkshape b_5
#Result: BRepCheck_BadOrientationOfSubshape

# Case 2.
box b1 10 10 10
box b2 20 0 0 10 10 10

explode b1
explode b2
shape z So
add b1_1 z
add b2_1 z
invert z

checkshape z
#Result: This shape seems to be valid

explode b1 f
explode b2 f
explode b1_5
explode b2_5

mksurface s b1_5
mkface fs s
add b1_5_1 fs
add b2_5_1 fs

checkshape fs
# Result:
#On Shape faulty_1 :
#BRepCheck_InvalidImbricationOfWires
TagsNo tags attached.
Test case number
Attached Files

- Relationships
related to 0026609closedbugmaster Wrong result obtained by solid classifier algorithm. 

-  Notes
There are no notes attached to this issue.

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2015-08-24 10:04 pkv New Issue
2015-08-24 10:04 pkv Assigned To => jgv
2015-08-24 10:04 pkv Status new => assigned
2015-08-27 09:36 pkv Steps to Reproduce Updated View Revisions
2015-08-27 09:57 pkv Relationship added related to 0026609
2015-10-28 16:11 msv Target Version 7.0.0 => 7.1.0
2015-10-28 16:12 msv Assigned To jgv => msv
2016-10-28 17:52 msv Target Version 7.1.0 => 7.2.0
2017-07-24 09:22 msv Target Version 7.2.0 => 7.3.0
2017-12-05 17:09 msv Target Version 7.3.0 => 7.4.0*


Copyright © 2000 - 2018 MantisBT Team
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker