| View Revisions: Issue #29828 |
[ All Revisions ] [ Back to Issue ] |
| Summary |
0029828: Coding Rules - specify preferred style for declaring OCCT RTTI elements in class definition |
|
| Revision |
2018-05-31 11:50 by kgv |
|
| Description |
Currently, different OCCT classes follow different style while declaring RTTI elements like DEFINE_STANDARD_RTTIEXT, DEFINE_STANDARD_HANDLE, DEFINE_STANDARD_ALLOC and the list of friend classes.
Most headers have been generated from CDL files by WOK in past and inherits multiple ugliness (like empty "protected: " sections) and obsolete elements (like DEFINE_STANDARD_HANDLE at the beginning of the file with redundant forward declared class; DEFINE_STANDARD_RTTIEXT put in the middle of class methods), while C++ headers created without CDL legacy (before/after WOK removal) follow different style.
It is desired determining the common style for these elements to avoid confusion. |
|
| Revision |
2018-05-31 10:54 by kgv |
|
| Description |
Currently, different OCCT classes follow different style while declaring RTTI elements like DEFINE_STANDARD_RTTIEXT, DEFINE_STANDARD_HANDLE, DEFINE_STANDARD_ALLOC and the list of friend classes.
Most headers have been generated from CDL files by WOK in past and inherits multiple ugliness (like empty "protected: " sections) and obsolete elements (like DEFINE_STANDARD_HANDLE at the beginning of the file with redundant forward declared class), while C++ headers created without CDL legacy (before/after WOK removal) follow different style.
It is desired determining the common style for these elements to avoid confusion. |
