MantisBT
Mantis Bug Tracker Workflow

View Revisions: Issue #28377 All Revisions ] Back to Issue ]
Summary 0028377: Valid face is classified as bad by BRepCheck algorithm
Revision 2017-01-20 16:55 by nbv
Description Two attached faces have the same topological structure (tolerance, number of entities and their orientation). They differ by width of the ring only (validface.brep has ring width 1.0+1.0e-5, problemface.brep has ring width 1.0e-5) - see attached picture "Valid and NOT valid faces.PNG".

However, one shape (validface.brep) is valid and another shape (problemface.brep) is not valid (BRepCheck_BadOrientationOfSubshape).

Indeed, two faces seems to be valid.
Revision 2017-01-20 16:39 by nbv
Description Two attached faces have the same topological structure (tolerance, number of entities and their orientation). They differ by width of the ring only (validface.brep has ring width 1.0+1.0e-5, problemface.brep has ring width 1.0e-5).

However, one shape (validface.brep) is valid and another shape (problemface.brep) is not valid (BRepCheck_BadOrientationOfSubshape).

Indeed, two faces seems to be valid.
Revision 2017-01-20 14:56 by nbv
Description Two attached faces have the same topological structure (tolerance, number of entities and their orientation).

However, one shape (validface.brep) is valid and another shape (problemface.brep) is not valid (BRepCheck_BadOrientationOfSubshape).

Indeed, two faces seems to be valid.


Copyright © 2000 - 2019 MantisBT Team
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker